On may 4 1985 appellant was discovered in arizona by his ex wife and the child was placed in child protective service custody here on may 7 1985 appellant obtained a temporary restraining order allowing the child to remain in arizona in violation of that order candie golden fled the state with the child. Kathleen a mccarthy tucson for petitioner appellant stephen d neely pima co atty by paul tang tucson for real party in interest. Coopervdupnikunlawful interrogation invites liability i introduction in cooper v dupnik the ninth circuit sitting en bane held that an interrogation scheme employed by the tucson po lice department and the pima county sheriffs department in tended to elicit a confession infringed on a suspects constitu. By stacey l kepnes published on 09 15 10. Pennsylvania state police 548 f supp 9 edpa 1982 and golden v dupnik 726 p2d 1096 1098 arizctapp1986 if these requirements are satisfied the court looks no further and denies the petition there is no inquiry into the merits of the charges on which extradition is based
How it works:
1. Register a Free 1 month Trial Account.
2. Download as many books as you like (Personal use)
3. No Commitment. Cancel anytime.
4. Join with over 1.000.000 Happy Readers.
5. That's it. What are you waiting for? Sign Up and Get Your Books.